Mupirocin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

•Systematic review on the global prevalence of mupirocin-resistant and high-level mupirocin-resistant S. aureus.•Subgroup analysis on prevalence of mupirocin resistance based on study period and continent.•High prevalence of mupirocin resistance among clinical S. aureus and MRSA isolates was reporte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of global antimicrobial resistance. 2020-03, Vol.20, p.238-247
Hauptverfasser: Dadashi, Masoud, Hajikhani, Bahareh, Darban-Sarokhalil, Davood, van Belkum, Alex, Goudarzi, Mehdi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Systematic review on the global prevalence of mupirocin-resistant and high-level mupirocin-resistant S. aureus.•Subgroup analysis on prevalence of mupirocin resistance based on study period and continent.•High prevalence of mupirocin resistance among clinical S. aureus and MRSA isolates was reported Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most common pathogens causing nosocomial and community-acquired infections associated with high morbidity and mortality. Mupirocin has been increasingly used for treatment of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of mupirocin-resistant S. aureus (MuRSA), mupirocin-resistant MRSA (MuRMRSA), high-level MuRSA (HLMuRSA) and high-level MuRMRSA (HLMuRMRSA) worldwide. Online databases including Medline, Embase and Web of Science were searched (2000–2018) to identify studies addressing the prevalence of MuRSA, MuRMRSA, HLMuRSA and HLMuRMRSA. STATA v. software was used to interpret the data. Of the 2243 records identified from the databases, 30 and 63 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria for MuRSA and MuRMRSA, respectively. Finally, 27 and 60 studies were included separately for HLMuRSA and HLMuRMRSA, respectively. The analyses revealed pooled and averaged prevalences of MuRSA, MuRMRSA, HLMuRSA and HLMuRMRSA of 7.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.2–9.0%], 13.8% (95% CI 12.0–15.6%), 8.5% (95% CI 6.3–10.7%) and 8.1% (95% CI 6.8–9.4%), respectively. Overall, these results show a global increase in the prevalence of HLMuRSA and HLMuRMRSA among clinical S. aureus isolates over time. However, there was only a significant increase in the prevalence of MuRMRSA compared with the other categories, especially MuRSA. Since mupirocin remains the most effective antibiotic for MSSA and MRSA decolonisation both in patients and healthcare personnel, a reduction of its effectiveness presents a risk for invasive infection. Monitoring of mupirocin resistance development remains critical.
ISSN:2213-7165
2213-7173
DOI:10.1016/j.jgar.2019.07.032