Biogas Production and Energy Balance in a Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion of Fruit and Vegetable Waste: Thermophilic versus Mesophilic

This study aimed to investigate biogas production and energy balance in a two-stage anaerobic digestion system of fruit/vegetable waste under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions. Firstly, the feedstock was hydrolyzed and acidified in an acidic reactor at 37 °C with a retention time of 5 d. Then,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fermentation (Basel) 2023-07, Vol.9 (7), p.601
Hauptverfasser: Dinh, Pham Van, Fujiwara, Takeshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to investigate biogas production and energy balance in a two-stage anaerobic digestion system of fruit/vegetable waste under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions. Firstly, the feedstock was hydrolyzed and acidified in an acidic reactor at 37 °C with a retention time of 5 d. Then, the liquid hydrolysate was collected and pumped into an up-flow methane reactor under a mesophilic temperature with a retention time of 5 d and a thermophilic condition with a retention time of 3 d. The experimental results showed that in the thermophilic methane reactor, the COD removal, biogas yield, and methane concentration were 96.3%, 492 mL/g-VS, and 70.4%, respectively. These values were 3%, 10%, and 3% higher, respectively, than those obtained in the mesophilic methane reactor. In terms of energy, the mesophilic and thermophilic methane reactors consumed the same thermal energy demand for temperature control. They were much lower than the heat values produced by the power engine. The two-stage anaerobic digestion system using a thermophilic methane reactor obtained a gross energy of 11.20 kJ/g-VS and a net energy of 9.83 kJ/g-VS. These values were 13.2% and 14.8% higher, respectively, than those obtained by the system with a mesophilic condition. Moreover, the use of a thermophilic reactor helped reduce the reactor volume by 40%, leading to significant investment cost savings.
ISSN:2311-5637
2311-5637
DOI:10.3390/fermentation9070601