Combining spatial response features and machine learning classifiers for landslide susceptibility mapping

•A framework that combines SPP, DSC, and ML classifiers was proposed for more accurate LSM the first time.•Spatial and response features were fused as high-level features by considering different dimensions.•Samples considering landslide scales could improve performance for LSM.•ML can classify feat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation 2022-03, Vol.107, p.102681, Article 102681
Hauptverfasser: Wei, Ruilong, Ye, Chengming, Sui, Tianbo, Ge, Yonggang, Li, Yao, Li, Jonathan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•A framework that combines SPP, DSC, and ML classifiers was proposed for more accurate LSM the first time.•Spatial and response features were fused as high-level features by considering different dimensions.•Samples considering landslide scales could improve performance for LSM.•ML can classify features more effectively than FC layers. Reliable landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is essential for disaster prevention and mitigation. This study develops a deep learning framework that integrates spatial response features and machine learning classifiers (SR-ML). The method has three steps. First, depthwise separable convolution (DSC) extracts spatial features to prevent confusion of multi-factor features. Second, spatial pyramid pooling (SPP) extracts response features to obtain features under different scales. Third, the high-level features are fused into prepared ML classifiers for more effective feature classification. This framework effectively extracts and uses different-dimension features of samples, explores ML classifiers for beneficial feature classification, and breaks through the limitation of fixed input sample sizes. In the Yarlung Zangbo Grand Canyon region, data on 203 landslides and 11 conditioning factors were prepared for availability verification and LSM. The evaluation indicated that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the proposed SR and SR-ML achieved 0.920 and 0.910, which were 6.6% and 5.6% higher than the random forest (RF, with the highest AUC in ML group) method, respectively. Furthermore, the framework using 64×64 size inputs had the lowest mean error of 0.01, revealing that samples considering landslide scales could improve performance for LSM.
ISSN:1569-8432
1872-826X
DOI:10.1016/j.jag.2022.102681