Cell‐to‐cell and type‐to‐type heterogeneity of signaling networks: insights from the crowd

Recent technological developments allow us to measure the status of dozens of proteins in individual cells. This opens the way to understand the heterogeneity of complex multi‐signaling networks across cells and cell types, with important implications to understand and treat diseases such as cancer....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Molecular systems biology 2021-10, Vol.17 (10), p.e10402-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Gabor, Attila, Tognetti, Marco, Driessen, Alice, Tanevski, Jovan, Guo, Baosen, Cao, Wencai, Shen, He, Yu, Thomas, Chung, Verena, Bodenmiller, Bernd, Saez‐Rodriguez, Julio, Prusokas, Augustinas, Prusokas, Alidivinas, Retkute, Renata, Rajasekar, Anand, Raman, Karthik, Sudhakar, Malvika, Rengaswamy, Raghunathan, Shih, Edward S.C., Kim, Min‐jeong, Cho, Changje, Kim, Dohyang, Oh, Hyeju, Hwang, Jinseub, Jongtae, Kim, Nam, Yeongeun, Yoon, Sanghoo, Kwon, Taeyong, Lee, Kyeongjun, Chaudhary, Sarika, Sharma, Nehal, Bande, Shreya, Cankut Cubuk, Gao Gao fan zhu, Gundogdu, Pelin, Dopazo, Joaquin, Rian, Kinza, Loucera, Carlos, Falco, Matias M, Garrido‐Rodriguez, Martin, Peña‐Chilet, Maria, Chen, Huiyuan, Turu, Gabor, Hunyadi, Laszlo, Misak, Adam, Zhou, Lisheng, Jiang, Xiaoqing, Zhang, Pieta, Rai, Aakansha, Kutum, Rintu, Rana, Sadhna, Srinivasan, Rajgopal, Pradhan, Swatantra, Li, James, Bajic, Vladimir, Van Neste, Christophe, Barradas‐bautista, Didier, Albarade, Somayah Abdullah, Nikolskiy, Igor, Sinkala, Musalula, Tran, Duc, Nguyen, Hung, Nguyen, Tin, Wu, Alexander, DeMeo, Benjamin, Hie, Brian, Singh, Rohit, Liu, Jiwei, Chen, Xueer, Saiz, Leonor, Vilar, Jose M. G, Qiu, Peng, Gosain, Akash, Dhall, Anjali, Bajaj, Dinesh, Kaur, Harpreet, Bagaria, Krishna, Chauhan, Mayank, Sharma, Neelam, Raghava, Gajendra, Patiyal, Sumeet, Hao, Jianye, Peng, Jiajie, Ning, Shangyi, Ma, Yi, Wei, Zhongyu, Aalto, Atte, Goncalves, Jorge, Mombaerts, Laurent, Dai, Xinnan, Zheng, Jie, Mundra, Piyushkumar, Xu, Fan, Wang, Jie, Kant Singh, Krishna, Lee, Mingyu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recent technological developments allow us to measure the status of dozens of proteins in individual cells. This opens the way to understand the heterogeneity of complex multi‐signaling networks across cells and cell types, with important implications to understand and treat diseases such as cancer. These technologies are, however, limited to proteins for which antibodies are available and are fairly costly, making predictions of new markers and of existing markers under new conditions a valuable alternative. To assess our capacity to make such predictions and boost further methodological development, we organized the Single Cell Signaling in Breast Cancer DREAM challenge. We used a mass cytometry dataset, covering 36 markers in over 4,000 conditions totaling 80 million single cells across 67 breast cancer cell lines. Through four increasingly difficult subchallenges, the participants predicted missing markers, new conditions, and the time‐course response of single cells to stimuli in the presence and absence of kinase inhibitors. The challenge results show that despite the stochastic nature of signal transduction in single cells, the signaling events are tightly controlled and machine learning methods can accurately predict new experimental data. Synopsis This study presents the results and conclusions of the ‘Single Cell Signaling in Breast Cancer DREAM challenge’, where teams were challenged to use state‐of‐the‐art methods for predicting single‐cell signaling from single‐cell and bulk proteomics, transcriptomics and genomics data. Over 80 million single‐cell multiplexed measurements across 67 cell lines, 54 conditions and 10 time points are used to benchmark predictive models of single‐cell signaling. 73 approaches are used by 27 teams for predicting responses to kinase inhibitors on single cell level, and dynamic responses from unperturbed basal omics data. Top models of whole signaling response models perform almost as well as a biological replicate. Cell‐line specific variation in dynamics can be partially predicted from basal omics. Graphical Abstract This study presents the results and conclusions of the ‘Single Cell Signaling in Breast Cancer DREAM challenge’, where teams were challenged to use state‐of‐the‐art methods for predicting single‐cell signaling from single‐cell and bulk proteomics, transcriptomics and genomics data.
ISSN:1744-4292
1744-4292
DOI:10.15252/msb.202110402