Intracranial pressure responsiveness to positive end-expiratory pressure is influenced by chest wall elastance: a physiological study in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Respiratory system elastance (E ) is an important determinant of the responsiveness of intracranial pressure (ICP) to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). However, lung elastance (E ) and chest wall elastance (E ) were not differentiated in previous studies. We tested the hypothesis that patient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC neurology 2018-08, Vol.18 (1), p.124-124, Article 124
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Han, Chen, Kai, Xu, Jing-Qing, Zhang, Ying-Rui, Yu, Rong-Guo, Zhou, Jian-Xin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Respiratory system elastance (E ) is an important determinant of the responsiveness of intracranial pressure (ICP) to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). However, lung elastance (E ) and chest wall elastance (E ) were not differentiated in previous studies. We tested the hypothesis that patients with high E or a high E /E ratio have greater ICP responsiveness to PEEP. An esophageal balloon catheter was placed to measure esophageal pressure. PEEP was increased from 5 to 15 cmH O. Airway pressure and esophageal pressure were measured and E , E and E were calculated at the two PEEP levels. Patients were classified into either an ICP responder group or a non-responder group based on whether the change of ICP after PEEP adjustment was greater than or less than the median of the overall study population. The magnitude of the increase in esophageal pressure (median [interquartile range]) at end-expiratory occlusion was significantly increased in the responder group compared with that in the non-responder group (4.1 [2.7-4.1] versus 2.7 [0.0-2.7] cmH O, p = 0.033) after PEEP adjustment. E and the E /E ratio were significantly higher in ICP responders than in non-responders at both low PEEP (p = 0.021 and 0.017) and high PEEP (p = 0.011 and 0.025) levels. No significant differences in E and E were noted between the two groups at both PEEP levels. Patients with greater ICP responsiveness to increased PEEP exhibit higher E and a higher E /E ratio, suggesting the importance of ECW monitoring.
ISSN:1471-2377
1471-2377
DOI:10.1186/s12883-018-1132-2