A comparative study on passive films of Fe–11Cr stainless steel and Fe–20Mn–11.5Al–1.4C–5Cr lightweight steel

Fe–20Mn–11.5Al–1.4C–5Cr (wt%) lightweight stainless steel (LWSS) was found to have equivalent or better resistance to pitting corrosion than Fe–11Cr (wt%) stainless steel (SS). The desirable resistance to pitting corrosion of the LWSS alloy was attributed to the formation of protective passive film....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of materials research and technology 2023-09, Vol.26, p.6135-6145
Hauptverfasser: Ha, Heon-Young, Kim, Kyeong-Won, Park, Seong-Jun, Lee, Chang-Hoon, Lee, Tae-Ho, Hong, Hyun-Uk, Moon, Joonoh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Fe–20Mn–11.5Al–1.4C–5Cr (wt%) lightweight stainless steel (LWSS) was found to have equivalent or better resistance to pitting corrosion than Fe–11Cr (wt%) stainless steel (SS). The desirable resistance to pitting corrosion of the LWSS alloy was attributed to the formation of protective passive film. On LWSS, an (Al,Fe,Cr)-oxide was formed, and on SS, a (Fe,Cr)-oxide was formed. The passive film of LWSS had a higher Cr + Al content than that of SS. In addition, compared to the passive film of SS, the passive film of LWSS was found to be thick and the concentration of point defects was also low.
ISSN:2238-7854
DOI:10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.018