Size, geography, and GVC participation of firms in Nigeria and Rwanda: Implications for the AfCFTA

•We analyse firm size and geographical location influence on GVC.•It engages the Enterprise Survey Data for Nigeria and Rwanda.•A binary logit model is used as an empirical strategy.•The results show that the size of the firm as well as geographical location influences firm GVC participation. Global...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research in Globalization 2024-06, Vol.8, p.1-10, Article 100193
Hauptverfasser: Karakara, Alhassan Abdul-Wakeel, Osabuohien, Evans Stephen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We analyse firm size and geographical location influence on GVC.•It engages the Enterprise Survey Data for Nigeria and Rwanda.•A binary logit model is used as an empirical strategy.•The results show that the size of the firm as well as geographical location influences firm GVC participation. Global value chains (GVC) have recently become an important developmental issue and have become prominent within the development community. Empirical studies on the peculiar nature of firms (small-scale) in the GVC are sparse, especially in Africa. Thus, the present study empirically examines whether or not the size of the firm matters in their GVC participation in Africa. It also investigates if a firm’s geographical location spurs GVC participation. The study answers the above research questions using the World Bank's Enterprise Survey database for two African countries, namely: Nigeria, and Rwanda. Adopting a logit regression model, the findings show that firms in Africa are predominantly small-scale and sole proprietorships. The size of the firm, the legal status of the firm, firm access to ICTs, managerial experience, and the geographical location of the firm are crucial drivers of firms' GVC participation in Nigeria and Rwanda. Policy implications and recommendations for the AfCFTA are discussed in the paper.
ISSN:2590-051X
2590-051X
DOI:10.1016/j.resglo.2024.100193