Reply to "Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View"

Reply to "Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View"

This paper replies to Chowdhury’s (2010) response to the paper "Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh" (2010). It challenges the strength of the criticisms, arguing that the factors discussed in Chowdhury (2010) do not necessarily impair the outcome of the resear...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australasian accounting, business & finance journal business & finance journal, 2012-09, Vol.6 (3), p.121-131
Hauptverfasser: Rashid, Afzalur, De Zoysa, Anura, Lodh, Sudhir, Rudkin, Kathy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Age
Bangladesh
Bias
Board composition
Boards of directors
Corporate governance
Disclosure
Expenditures
firm performance
independent directors
Literature reviews
Profitability
Profits
R&D
Research & development
Stock exchanges
Variables
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper replies to Chowdhury’s (2010) response to the paper "Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh" (2010). It challenges the strength of the criticisms, arguing that the factors discussed in Chowdhury (2010) do not necessarily impair the outcome of the research. The authors elucidate issues raised, and in so doing, reproduce the results incorporating the commentator’s suggestions.
ISSN:1834-2000
1834-2019