Evaluation of Intraocular Lens Rotational Stability in a Multicenter Clinical Trial

Purpose: To evaluate the postoperative rotational stability of two prototype intraocular lens (IOL) designs (subsequently termed version 1 and version 2). Patients and Methods: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, paired-eye, 6-month study evaluated the version 1 and version 2 IOLs. Results were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) N.Z.), 2021-01, Vol.15, p.3001-3016
Hauptverfasser: Vukich, John A, Ang, Robert E, Straker, Benjamin J.K, Janakiraman, Devi Priya, Smith, Pamela J, Batlle, Juan F, Waltz, Kevin L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: To evaluate the postoperative rotational stability of two prototype intraocular lens (IOL) designs (subsequently termed version 1 and version 2). Patients and Methods: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, paired-eye, 6-month study evaluated the version 1 and version 2 IOLs. Results were compared with a control IOL (TECNIS[R] toric 1-piece monofocal IOL) evaluated in a separate, similarly designed study. Participants aged [greater than or equal to]22 years and scheduled to undergo bilateral cataract extraction were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive the version 1 or version 2 IOL in the first operative eye; the alternate test IOL was then implanted in the second operative eye. Results: Mean absolute IOL rotation at postoperative week 1 was the primary effectiveness end point. Additional end points included the percentage of eyes with postoperative IOL rotation >5[degrees]/>10[degrees], direction of lens rotation, surgeon-reported ease of IOL handling during implantation, and safety. At postoperative week 1, mean ([+ or -] standard deviation) absolute IOL rotation was significantly lower for both version 1 and version 2 versus control (0.88[degrees] [[+ or -]0.94] and 0.71[degrees] [[+ or -]0.69] vs 2.24[degrees] [[+ or -]3.21], respectively; both P < 0.001). For both study lenses, absolute rotation was 10[degrees] were observed at any postoperative time point. From postoperative week 1 onward, version 2 had a statistically significant clockwise bias in the direction of rotation (P = 0.03); similar findings were observed for version 1. Surgeons reported acceptable ease of IOL handling during implantation for both version 1 and version 2. No device-related adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Both the version 1 and version 2 IOLs, each with frosted, squared haptics, demonstrated improved postoperative rotational stability compared with a control lens without frosted haptics. Because version 2 had the same overall geometry as the current TECNIS toric IOL, this design was selected for commercialization. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00015287. Keywords: astigmatism, cataract, IOL rotation, surgery, toric IOL
ISSN:1177-5483
1177-5467
1177-5483
DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S309214