Sensitivity of glacier volume change estimation to DEM void interpolation
Glacier mass balance has been estimated on individual glacier and regional scales using repeat digital elevation models (DEMs). DEMs often have gaps in coverage (“voids”), the properties of which depend on the nature of the sensor used and the surface being measured. The way that these voids are acc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The cryosphere 2019-03, Vol.13 (3), p.895-910 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Glacier mass balance has been estimated on individual glacier and regional
scales using repeat digital elevation models (DEMs). DEMs often have gaps in
coverage (“voids”), the properties of which depend on the nature of the
sensor used and the surface being measured. The way that these voids are
accounted for has a direct impact on the estimate of geodetic glacier mass
balance, though a systematic comparison of different proposed methods has
been heretofore lacking. In this study, we determine the impact and
sensitivity of void interpolation methods on estimates of volume change.
Using two spatially complete, high-resolution DEMs over southeast Alaska,
USA, we artificially generate voids in one of the DEMs using correlation
values derived from photogrammetric processing of Advanced Spaceborne Thermal
Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) scenes. We then compare 11
different void interpolation methods on a glacier-by-glacier and regional
basis. We find that a few methods introduce biases of up to 20 % in the
regional results, while other methods give results very close ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1994-0424 1994-0416 1994-0424 1994-0416 |
DOI: | 10.5194/tc-13-895-2019 |