Validation of a noninvasive aMMP‐8 point‐of‐care diagnostic methodology in COVID‐19 patients with periodontal disease

Objectives The aim of this study was to validate an active matrix metalloproteinase (MMP‐8) point‐of‐care diagnostic tool in COVID‐19 patients with periodontal disease. Subjects, Materials, and Methods Seventy‐two COVID‐19‐positive and 30 COVID‐19‐negative subjects were enrolled in the study. Demogr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical and experimental dental research 2022-08, Vol.8 (4), p.988-1001
Hauptverfasser: Gupta, Shipra, Mohindra, Ritin, Singla, Mohita, Khera, Sagar, Kumar, Amit, Rathnayake, Nilminie, Sorsa, Timo, Pfützner, Andreas, Räisänen, Ismo T., Soni, Roop K., Kanta, Poonam, Jain, Akanksha, Gauba, Krishan, Goyal, Kapil, Singh, Mini P., Ghosh, Arnab, Kajal, Kamal, Mahajan, Varun, Suri, Vikas, Bhalla, Ashish
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives The aim of this study was to validate an active matrix metalloproteinase (MMP‐8) point‐of‐care diagnostic tool in COVID‐19 patients with periodontal disease. Subjects, Materials, and Methods Seventy‐two COVID‐19‐positive and 30 COVID‐19‐negative subjects were enrolled in the study. Demographic data were recorded, periodontal examination carried out, and chairside tests run for evaluating the expression of active MMP‐8 (aMMP‐8) in the site with maximum periodontal breakdown via gingival crevicular fluid sampling as well as via a mouth rinse‐based kit for general disease activity. In COVID‐19‐positive patients, the kits were run again once the patients turned COVID‐19 negative. Results The overall (n = 102) sensitivity/specificity of the mouthrinse‐based kits to detect periodontal disease was 79.41%/36.76% and that of site‐specific kits was 64.71%/55.88% while adjusting for age, gender, and smoking status increased the sensitivity and specificity (82.35%/76.47% and 73.53%/88.24, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for the adjusted model revealed very good area under the ROC curve 0.746–0.869 (p 
ISSN:2057-4347
2057-4347
DOI:10.1002/cre2.589