Effect of systemic administration of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019 on apical periodontitis

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (B. lactis) HN019 in drinking water on the development of apical periodontitis (AP) in rats. In total 60 animals were divided into a control group (sound teeth); Group I - regular water without AP; Group II - probiotic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brazilian oral research 2023-01, Vol.37, p.e115-e115
Hauptverfasser: ARAUJO, Lisa Danielly Curcino, SEGATO, Raquel Assed Bezerra, REIS, Thaís de Paula Colen, SALVADOR, Sérgio Luis de Souza, FURLANETO, Flávia Aparecida Chaves, MESSORA, Michel Reis, NELSON-FILHO, Paulo, ALMEIDA, Lana Kei Yamamoto de, LUCISANO, Marília Pacífico, SILVA, Clara Marina Pereira Cavalcanti, SILVA, Léa Assed Bezerra da
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (B. lactis) HN019 in drinking water on the development of apical periodontitis (AP) in rats. In total 60 animals were divided into a control group (sound teeth); Group I - regular water without AP; Group II - probiotic water without AP; Group III - regular water with AP; Group IV - probiotic water with AP. AP was induced after 3 days in the control groups and after 7, 21, and 42 days in groups III and IV. The animals were euthanized, and the mandibles were subjected to histotechnical processing. Samples were stained with hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) to identify root canal features, apical and periapical regions. Additionally, histoenzymology was performed to detect osteoclasts, immunohistochemistry was used to identify osteoclastogenesis markers, and the Brown & Brenn technique was applied for microbiological analysis. The data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 8.0.1 with a significance level of 5%. Although no statistical differences were observed, the groups administered with probiotics showed better conditions in terms of histological aspects seen microscopically. Furthermore, there were no differences in the number of osteoclasts (p > 0.05). The RANKL marker was not found in the probiotic group at 42 days, unlike in group III.
ISSN:1806-8324
1807-3107
1807-3107
DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0115