Performance improvement of ejector refrigerator–based water chiller working with different mixing chamber profiles

•Performance of the ejector refrigerator was studied under different ejector profiles.•Significant performance improvement was achieved when using the CRMC–ejector.•The Tchill produced by CRMC–ejector was much lower than CONV–ejector.•The CRMC–ejector produced better performance under various workin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alexandria engineering journal 2021-08, Vol.60 (4), p.3693-3707
Hauptverfasser: Sutthivirode, Kittiwoot, Thongtip, Tongchana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Performance of the ejector refrigerator was studied under different ejector profiles.•Significant performance improvement was achieved when using the CRMC–ejector.•The Tchill produced by CRMC–ejector was much lower than CONV–ejector.•The CRMC–ejector produced better performance under various working conditions.•The system COP can be increased by 27–63% via the CRMC–ejector. This paper proposes the performance improvement of the ejector refrigerator based water chiller (ejector-based chiller) by means of using different mixing chamber profiles. Two different ejector mixing chamber profiles are constructed which are based on the conventional method (CONV–ejector) and the constant rate of momentum change method (CRMC–ejector). With the different design methods, the ejectors have different flow areas along the ejector’s axis; however, they have identical ejector throat diameters of 9 mm. Both ejectors are equipped with two primary nozzles, and hence, they have the same ejector area ratio of 6.3 and 7.9, respectively. The refrigerator is powered by hot water at a temperature of 94–98 °C while the condenser is cooled by cooling water at 29–31 °C. The chilled water temperature (Tchill) under various cooling loads and COP is assessed. It is found that the CRMC–ejector produces a much lower chilled water temperature than the CONV–ejector at identical cooling load. The system COP can be increased by 27–63% via the CRMC–ejector. With the change in Thot, both ejectors produce identical Tchill; however, the CRMC–ejector still produces much lower Tchill at an identical cooling load. A larger primary nozzle throat yields a higher Tchill.
ISSN:1110-0168
DOI:10.1016/j.aej.2021.02.042