Hospital Length of Stay Prediction for Planned Admissions Using Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model: Retrospective Study

Background Accurate hospital length of stay (LoS) prediction enables efficient resource management. Conventional LoS prediction models with limited covariates and nonstandardized data have limited reproducibility when applied to the general population. Objective In this study, we developed and valid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical Internet research 2024-11, Vol.26 (4), p.e59260
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Haeun, Kim, Seok, Moon, Hui-Woun, Lee, Ho-Young, Kim, Kwangsoo, Jung, Se Young, Yoo, Sooyoung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Accurate hospital length of stay (LoS) prediction enables efficient resource management. Conventional LoS prediction models with limited covariates and nonstandardized data have limited reproducibility when applied to the general population. Objective In this study, we developed and validated a machine learning (ML)–based LoS prediction model for planned admissions using the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model (OMOP CDM). Methods Retrospective patient-level prediction models used electronic health record (EHR) data converted to the OMOP CDM (version 5.3) from Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (SNUBH) in South Korea. The study included 137,437 hospital admission episodes between January 2016 and December 2020. Covariates from the patient, condition occurrence, medication, observation, measurement, procedure, and visit occurrence tables were included in the analysis. To perform feature selection, we applied Lasso regularization in the logistic regression. The primary outcome was an LoS of 7 days or longer, while the secondary outcome was an LoS of 3 days or longer. The prediction models were developed using 6 ML algorithms, with the training and test set split in a 7:3 ratio. The performance of each model was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis measured feature importance, while calibration plots assessed the reliability of the prediction models. External validation of the developed models occurred at an independent institution, the Seoul National University Hospital. Results The final sample included 129,938 patient entry events in the planned admissions. The Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) model achieved the best performance in binary classification for predicting an LoS of 7 days or longer, with an AUROC of 0.891 (95% CI 0.887-0.894) and an AUPRC of 0.819 (95% CI 0.813-0.826) on the internal test set. The Light Gradient Boosting (LGB) model performed the best in the multiclassification for predicting an LoS of 3 days or more, with an AUROC of 0.901 (95% CI 0.898-0.904) and an AUPRC of 0.770 (95% CI 0.762-0.779). The most important features contributing to the models were the operation performed, frequency of previous outpatient visits, patient admission department, age, and day of admission. The RF model showed robust performance in the external validation set, a
ISSN:1438-8871
1439-4456
1438-8871
DOI:10.2196/59260