Encouraging arm use in stroke survivors: the impact of smart reminders during a home-based intervention

Upper limb impairment post-stroke often leads to a predominant use of the less affected arm and consequent learned disuse of the affected side, hindering upper limb outcome. Wearable sensors such as accelerometers, combined with smart reminders (i.e., based on the amount of arm activity), offer a po...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 2024-12, Vol.21 (1), p.220-12
Hauptverfasser: Mayrhuber, Laura, Andres, Sebastian D, Legrand, Mathilde L, Luft, Andreas R, Ryser, Franziska, Gassert, Roger, Veerbeek, Janne M, Duinen, Jannie van, Schwarz, Anne, Franinovic, Karmen, Rickert, Christoph, Schkommodau, Erik, O Held, Jeremia P, Easthope, Chris Awai, Lambercy, Olivier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Upper limb impairment post-stroke often leads to a predominant use of the less affected arm and consequent learned disuse of the affected side, hindering upper limb outcome. Wearable sensors such as accelerometers, combined with smart reminders (i.e., based on the amount of arm activity), offer a potential approach to promote increased use of the affected arm to improve upper limb use during daily life. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of wrist vibratory reminders during a six-week home-based intervention in chronic stroke survivors. We evaluated the impact of the home-based intervention on the primary outcome, the Motor Activity Log-14 Item Version scores Amount of Use (MAL-14 AOU), and the secondary outcomes MAL-14 Quality of Movement (QOM) and sensor-derived activity metrics from the affected arm. A randomized controlled trial design was used for the study: the intervention group received personalized reminders based on individualized arm activity goals, while the control group did not receive any feedback. Mixed linear models assessed the influence of the group, week of the intervention period, and initial impairment level on MAL-14 and arm activity metrics. Forty-two participants were enrolled in the study. Overall, participants exhibited modest but not clinically relevant increases in MAL-14 AOU (+ 0.2 points) and QOM (+ 0.2 points) after the intervention period, with no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control group. Feasibility challenges were noted, such as adherence to wearing the trackers and sensor data quality. However, in participants with sufficiently available sensor data (n = 23), the affected arm use extracted from the sensor data was significantly higher in the intervention group (p 
ISSN:1743-0003
1743-0003
DOI:10.1186/s12984-024-01527-2