Analysis of the Ensemble Method Classifier's Performance on Handwritten Arabic Characters Dataset

Arabic character handwriting is one of the patterns and characteristics of each person's writing. This characteristic makes Arabic writing more challenging if the letter recognition process is based on a dataset of Arabic scripts. This Arabic script has been presented in a dataset totaling 1680...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ilkom Jurnal Ilmiah 2023-04, Vol.15 (1), p.186-192
Hauptverfasser: Manga', Abdul Rachman, Handayani, Anik Nur, Herwanto, Heru Wahyu, Asmara, Rosa Andrie, Sulistya, Yudha Islami, Kasmira, Kasmira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Arabic character handwriting is one of the patterns and characteristics of each person's writing. This characteristic makes Arabic writing more challenging if the letter recognition process is based on a dataset of Arabic scripts. This Arabic script has been presented in a dataset totaling 16800, each representing a class of hijaiyah letters starting from alif to yes, consisting of 600 data for each class. The accuracy of the data used can be increased using the ensemble method. By using multiple algorithms at simultaneously, the ensemble technique can raise the level or result of a score in machine learning. This study's primary goal is to evaluate the ensemble method classifier's performance on datasets of handwritten Arabic characters. The classifier uses the ensemble method by applying the proposed soft voting to provide a multiclass classification of three machine learning algorithms, namely, SVM, Random Forest, and Decision Tree for classification. This research process produces an accuracy value for the voting classifier of 0.988 and several other SVM algorithms with an accuracy of 0.103, a random forest with an accuracy of 1.0, and a decision tree with an accuracy of 0.134. The test results used the confusion matrix evaluation model, including accuracy, precision, recall, and f1-score of 0.99.
ISSN:2087-1716
2548-7779
DOI:10.33096/ilkom.v15i1.1357.186-192