Long-term results of the custom- made hip endoprostheses Evolution K® and Adaptiva®: A prospective cohort study

The aim of our study is to evaluate clinical long-term results and determine changes in periprosthetic bone density of the custom-made hip prostheses Evolution-K and Adaptiva . Periprosthetic bone density were evaluated by means of DEXA (LunariDXA- Prodigy bone densitometer) with a long-term follow-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Orthopedic Reviews 2021-04, Vol.13 (1), p.9014-9014
Hauptverfasser: Axt, Steffen, Kirschniak, Andreas, Axt, Lena, Braun, Manuel, Beltzer, Christian, Leichtle, Carmen, Leichtle, Ulf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of our study is to evaluate clinical long-term results and determine changes in periprosthetic bone density of the custom-made hip prostheses Evolution-K and Adaptiva . Periprosthetic bone density were evaluated by means of DEXA (LunariDXA- Prodigy bone densitometer) with a long-term follow-up of 16 (15-18) years (Evolution-K ) in 24 patients and 13 (13-15) years (Adaptiva ) in 41 patients. Evolution- K had a survival rate of 92% and yielded 79/100 points in Harris Hip Score, a mediocre result. Adaptiva had a survival rate of 99% and achieved a good score of 88/100 points. Bone density measurements demonstrated the greatest loss of bone density in the proximal regions of interest (ROI) for both prosthesis types (Evolution-K : -25.8% ROI 1, -40.3% ROI 7; -8.3% ROI 2, -10.4% ROI 6; Adaptiva : -29.8% ROI 7, -6.8% ROI 6, +14.3% ROI 3, +3.1% ROI 4). Adaptiva yielded a good clinical result as compared to Evolution-K with only average clinical results. Both prostheses clearly showed signs of "stress shielding". Here, the Adaptiva achieved reduced bone density loss as compared to the Evolution-K .
ISSN:2035-8237
2035-8164
DOI:10.4081/or.2021.9014