Long-term results of the custom- made hip endoprostheses Evolution K® and Adaptiva®: A prospective cohort study
The aim of our study is to evaluate clinical long-term results and determine changes in periprosthetic bone density of the custom-made hip prostheses Evolution-K and Adaptiva . Periprosthetic bone density were evaluated by means of DEXA (LunariDXA- Prodigy bone densitometer) with a long-term follow-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Orthopedic Reviews 2021-04, Vol.13 (1), p.9014-9014 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The aim of our study is to evaluate clinical long-term results and determine changes in periprosthetic bone density of the custom-made hip prostheses Evolution-K
and Adaptiva
. Periprosthetic bone density were evaluated by means of DEXA (LunariDXA- Prodigy
bone densitometer) with a long-term follow-up of 16 (15-18) years (Evolution-K
) in 24 patients and 13 (13-15) years (Adaptiva
) in 41 patients. Evolution- K
had a survival rate of 92% and yielded 79/100 points in Harris Hip Score, a mediocre result. Adaptiva
had a survival rate of 99% and achieved a good score of 88/100 points. Bone density measurements demonstrated the greatest loss of bone density in the proximal regions of interest (ROI) for both prosthesis types (Evolution-K
: -25.8% ROI 1, -40.3% ROI 7; -8.3% ROI 2, -10.4% ROI 6; Adaptiva
: -29.8% ROI 7, -6.8% ROI 6, +14.3% ROI 3, +3.1% ROI 4). Adaptiva
yielded a good clinical result as compared to Evolution-K
with only average clinical results. Both prostheses clearly showed signs of "stress shielding". Here, the Adaptiva
achieved reduced bone density loss as compared to the Evolution-K
. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2035-8237 2035-8164 |
DOI: | 10.4081/or.2021.9014 |