Research and application of parameter estimation method in hydrological model based on dual ensemble Kalman filter

Although field measurements and using long hydrological datasets provide a reliable method for parameters' calibration, changes in the underlying basin surface and lack of hydrometeorological data may affect parameter accuracy in streamflow simulation. The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) can be u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrology Research 2022-01, Vol.53 (1), p.65-84
Hauptverfasser: Lu, Mengtian, Lu, Sicheng, Liao, Weihong, Lei, Xiaohui, Yin, Zhaokai, Wang, Hao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Although field measurements and using long hydrological datasets provide a reliable method for parameters' calibration, changes in the underlying basin surface and lack of hydrometeorological data may affect parameter accuracy in streamflow simulation. The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) can be used as a real-time parameter correction method to solve this problem. In this study, five representative Xin'anjiang model parameters are selected to study the effects of the initial parameter ensemble distribution and the specific function form of the parameter on the EnKF parameter estimation process for both single and multiple parameters. Results indicate: (1) the method of parameter calibration to determine the initial distribution mean can improve the assimilation efficiency; (2) there is mutual interference among the parameters during multiple parameters' estimation which invalidates some conclusions of single-parameter estimation. We applied and evaluated the EnKF method in Jinjiang River Basin, China. Compared to traditional approaches, our method showed a better performance in both basins with long hydrometeorological dataset (an increase of Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE) from 0.810 to 0.887 and a decrease of bias from −1.08% to −0.74%); and in basins with a lack of hydrometeorological data (an increase of KGE from 0.536 to 0.849 and a decrease of bias from −15.55% to −11.42%).
ISSN:0029-1277
1998-9563
2224-7955
DOI:10.2166/nh.2021.272