HAEMOcare: The First International Epidemiological Study Measuring Burden of Hemophilia in Developing Countries

Abstract Introduction  Optimizing hemophilia care remains challenging in developing countries. Burden-of-disease studies are important to develop strategies for improving hemophilia care. Aim  The HAEMOcare study evaluated the factors contributing to hemophilia-related orthopedic disease burden in d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis 2019-04, Vol.3 (2), p.e190-e199
Hauptverfasser: Gupta, Naresh, Benbouzid, Abderrahmane, Belhani, Meriem, El Andaloussi, Mohammed, Maani, Khadija, Wali, Yasser, Benchikh El Fegoun, Soraya, Saad, Hossam Ali, Mahlangu, Johnny
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction  Optimizing hemophilia care remains challenging in developing countries. Burden-of-disease studies are important to develop strategies for improving hemophilia care. Aim  The HAEMOcare study evaluated the factors contributing to hemophilia-related orthopedic disease burden in developing countries. Methods  HAEMOcare was a noninterventional, cross-sectional, epidemiological study conducted in Algeria, India, Morocco, Oman, and South Africa. Male patients with severe hemophilia ( N  = 282) aged ≥6 years, without or with inhibitors, being treated on-demand for bleeding were included. Hemophilia-related orthopedic clinical and functional status was assessed using the Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), radiological status with the Pettersson Score, and quality of life with the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L). Direct and indirect economic costs of hemophilia care were also calculated. Results  Patients (mean [standard deviation, SD] age: 20.8 [10.6] years) experienced a mean annualized bleeding rate of 25.8. Overall mean (SD) HJHS and Pettersson score were 17.9 (12.8) and 15.0 (13.5), respectively; scores were similar between patients without or with inhibitors ( p  = 0.21 and 0.76, respectively). Approximately 70% of adults reported problems relating to pain/discomfort and mobility parameters in the EQ-5D-3L. Mean distance to a hemophilia treatment center (HTC) was 79.4 km. As expected, total costs of hemophilia were statistically significantly higher in patients with inhibitors versus without inhibitors ( p  = 0.002). Conclusion  Inadequate access to HTCs and expert care, along with high bleeding rates, led to equivalent hemophilia-related orthopedic morbidity between hemophilia patients without and with inhibitors. HAEMOcare documented the economic and disease burdens associated with suboptimal hemophilia care in developing countries.
ISSN:2512-9465
2567-3459
2512-9465
DOI:10.1055/s-0039-1688414