Classification of Alzheimer’s Disease Patients Using Texture Analysis and Machine Learning

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has been studied extensively to understand the nature of this complex disease and address the many research gaps concerning prognosis and diagnosis. Several studies based on structural and textural characteristics have already been conducted to aid in identifying AD patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied system innovation 2021-09, Vol.4 (3), p.49
Hauptverfasser: Salunkhe, Sumit, Bachute, Mrinal, Gite, Shilpa, Vyas, Nishad, Khanna, Saanil, Modi, Keta, Katpatal, Chinmay, Kotecha, Ketan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has been studied extensively to understand the nature of this complex disease and address the many research gaps concerning prognosis and diagnosis. Several studies based on structural and textural characteristics have already been conducted to aid in identifying AD patients. In this work, an image processing methodology was used to extract textural information and classify the patients into two groups: AD and Cognitively Normal (CN). The Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) was employed since it is a strong foundation for texture classification. Various textural parameters derived from the GLCM aided in deciphering the characteristics of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) region of interest (ROI). Several commonly used image classification algorithms were employed. MATLAB was used to successfully derive 20 features based on the GLCM of the MRI dataset. Based on the data analysis, 8 of the 20 features were determined as significant elements. Ensemble (90.2%), Decision Trees (88.5%), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) (87.2%) were the best performing classifiers. It was observed in GLCM that as the distance (d) between pixels increased, the classification accuracy decreased. The best result was observed for GLCM with d = 1 and direction (d, d, −d) with age and structural data.
ISSN:2571-5577
2571-5577
DOI:10.3390/asi4030049