Molecular data support Bombus sonorus and Bombus pensylvanicus (Hymenoptera, Apidae) as distinct species
Despite their distinctive banding patterns, setal coloration, and geographic ranges, the Sonoran bumble bee ( Bombus sonorus Say, 1837) and the American bumble bee ( Bombus pensylvanicus De Geer, 1773) are often treated as conspecific, with some authorities ranking B. sonorus as a subspecies of B. p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Hymenoptera research 2024-10, Vol.97, p.895-914 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Despite their distinctive banding patterns, setal coloration, and geographic ranges, the Sonoran bumble bee (
Bombus sonorus
Say, 1837) and the American bumble bee (
Bombus pensylvanicus
De Geer, 1773) are often treated as conspecific, with some authorities ranking
B. sonorus
as a subspecies of
B. pensylvanicus
. This lack of taxonomic clarity creates challenges, particularly for population monitoring and conservation initiatives. In this study, we used genetic analyses to assess the potential for clinal variation, ongoing hybridization, and historical introgression between
B. pensylvanicus
and
B. sonorus
within a broad area of sympatry across the state of Texas. Double digest restriction associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq) was performed on 166 specimens (58
B. sonorus
and 108
B. pensylvanicus
), and a portion of the mitochondrial COI gene was sequenced for a subset of the specimens from Texas (46
B. sonorus
and 32
B. pensylvanicus
) and eight specimens of
B. sonorus
from California. An additional five sequences of
B. pensylvanicus
from Georgia and Florida were obtained from Genbank and BOLD along with one each of
B. transversalis
(Olivier, 1789),
B. mexicanus
Cresson, 1879,
B. medius
Cresson, 1863 and
B. fervidus
(Fabricius, 1798), and
B. mesomelas
Gerstäcker, 1869. For both genetic datasets (nuclear ddRADseq and mtDNA COI), individuals formed two distinct groups concordant with species identification based on setal coloration. We found no evidence supporting a clinal pattern of variation, ongoing hybridization, or historical introgression within the study area and conclude that
B. sonorus
should be recognized as a species under the Biological Species Concept. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1070-9428 1314-2607 1314-2607 |
DOI: | 10.3897/jhr.97.132937 |