Hearing loss in very preterm infants: should we wait or treat?

This study investigated hearing threshold changes during the first year of corrected age (CA) in infants admitted in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). In 5 years, 239 infants with birth weight (BW) ≤ 1,000 gm and/or gestational age (GA) ≤ 30 weeks were enrolled. Hearing was evaluated by oto-aco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta otorhino-laryngologica italica 2019-08, Vol.39 (4), p.257-262
Hauptverfasser: Frezza, S, Catenazzi, P, Gallus, R, Gallini, F, Fioretti, M, Anzivino, R, Corsello, M, Cota, F, Vento, G, Conti, G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study investigated hearing threshold changes during the first year of corrected age (CA) in infants admitted in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). In 5 years, 239 infants with birth weight (BW) ≤ 1,000 gm and/or gestational age (GA) ≤ 30 weeks were enrolled. Hearing was evaluated by oto-acoustic emission (OAEs) before discharge and auditory brainstem response (ABR) within 3 months of CA. Infants affected by unilateral or bilateral hearing loss were addressed to audiological follow-up until definitive diagnosis (within 6 months of CA). Changes in hearing threshold were also carefully analysed. 207 (86.6%) infants had normal hearing while 32 infants (13.4%) showed hearing loss (HL) at the confirmative ABR evaluation (9 mild, 16 moderate, 4 severe, 3 profound). The latter showed lower GA (27.7 ± 2 vs 28.4 ± 1.2; p = 0.0061) and BW (950 ± 390 vs 1,119 ± 326 gm; p = 0.0085). At final evaluation, 15 infants (47%) recovered a normal hearing. HL was confirmed in 17 patients. Among these, 3 infants were addressed to audiological follow-up (one case of mild unilateral hearing loss (UHL) and two with moderate UHL), while in 14 cases (44%) with bilateral sensory neural hearing loss (SNHL) (7 moderate, 4 severe, 3 profound) hearing aids were prescribed. They showed significantly lower GA and longer hospital stay in the NICU in comparison with infants without indication for audiological habilitation (18 infants) (GA 26.2 ± 2.2 weeks vs 28.4 ± 2.4; p = 0.01; NICU stay 132 ± 67 vs 59 ± 7; p = 0.0002). Definitive diagnosis was obtained at 5.9 ± 1.3 months of CA. Our study confirms the importance of audiological surveillance in preterm newborns. Hearing thresholds of preterm infants with hearing loss can change during the first year of CA and we observed normalisation in 47% of our patients. Most vulnerable to permanent SNHL were very preterm infants with a longer NICU stay, while a shorter stay represents a favourable prognostic factor for hearing improvement.
ISSN:1827-675X
0392-100X
1827-675X
DOI:10.14639/0392-100X-2116