Comparison of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation and parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism

Purpose: To compare the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) and parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. Methods: In an observational retrospective study, we compared the outcomes in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent ultrasound...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of hyperthermia 2019-01, Vol.36 (1), p.834-839
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Fangyi, Yu, Xiaoling, Liu, Zhoulu, Qiao, Zhi, Dou, Jianping, Cheng, Zhigang, Han, Zhiyu, Yu, Jie, Liang, Ping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: To compare the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) and parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. Methods: In an observational retrospective study, we compared the outcomes in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent ultrasound-guided MWA with the outcomes in those who underwent surgical resection (SR). The primary outcome was cure rate. Secondary outcomes were the rate of complications, and the difference of the treatment parameters of two treatment methods. Propensity-score matching was used to assemble a cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics. Results: Among 108 patients who met inclusion criteria, 28 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided MWA (MWA group) and 28 who underwent SR (SR group) had similar propensity scores and were included in the analyses. There was no significant difference in the cure rate between MWA group and SR group (82.1% vs. 89.3%, p = .705). Patients who underwent MWA had significantly less estimated blood loss and shorter surgical time than those who underwent SR (p 
ISSN:0265-6736
1464-5157
DOI:10.1080/02656736.2019.1645365