Effects of chitooligosaccharide on the in vitro antibacterial activity against avian Escherichia coli and the pharmacokinetics of florfenicol in healthy chickens

This study investigates the combined effects of chitooligosaccharide (COS) and florfenicol (FLO) on the inhibition of Escherichia coli in vitro, as well as the pharmacokinetic interactions between these compounds in healthy chickens. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of COS and FLO alone an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Poultry science 2024-02, Vol.103 (2), p.103373-103373, Article 103373
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Mei, Li, Ze-En, Duan, Ming-Hui, Dai, Yan, Jin, Yang-Guang, Liu, Yue, Zhang, Yan-Ni, Li, Xing-Ping, Yang, Fan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study investigates the combined effects of chitooligosaccharide (COS) and florfenicol (FLO) on the inhibition of Escherichia coli in vitro, as well as the pharmacokinetic interactions between these compounds in healthy chickens. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of COS and FLO alone and the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) after combined treatment were determined using the broth microdilution method and checkerboard method, respectively. Additionally, we evaluated the pharmacokinetic interactions between the 2 types of COS and FLO in healthy chickens. Thirty chickens were randomly divided into 3 groups: Florfenicol group (30 mg/kg), COS J85 group (COS J85 20 mg/kg + florfenicol 30 mg/kg), COS H85 group (COS H85 20 mg/kg + florfenicol 30 mg/kg). Either FLO or COS was orally administered by gavage. The concentrations of FLO in chicken plasma were measured at different time points after the drug withdrawal using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by a compartmental method. The results showed that COS J85 and COS H85, when combined with FLO, had FICI values of 0.1875 to 0.75 and 0.3125 to 1, respectively, indicating good synergistic or additive effects against Escherichia coli. The pharmacokinetics of FLO alone and in combination with COS followed a 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that the elimination half-life (t1/2ke) of florfenicol was significantly increased in the COS H85 group compared to oral administration of florfenicol alone (P < 0.05). Other pharmacokinetic parameters did not show significant changes (P > 0.05), except between the 2 combined treatment groups, where statistical differences were observed for various parameters, excluding the area under the concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to infinity (AUC) and peak concentration (Cmax).
ISSN:0032-5791
1525-3171
DOI:10.1016/j.psj.2023.103373