Achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets as assessed by different methods in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: an analysis from the HELLAS-FH registry
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. FH patients often have increased lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels, which further increase CVD risk. Novel methods for accurately calculatin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Lipids in health and disease 2020-05, Vol.19 (1), p.114-13, Article 114 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. FH patients often have increased lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels, which further increase CVD risk. Novel methods for accurately calculating LDL-C have been proposed.
Patients with FH were recruited by a network of Greek sites participating in the HELLAS-FH registry. LDL-C levels were calculated using the Friedewald (LDL-C
) and the Martin/Hopkins (LDL-C
) equations as well as after correcting LDL-C
for Lp(a) levels [LDL-C
]. The objective was to compare LDL-C levels and target achievement as estimated by different methods in FH patients.
This analysis included 1620 patients (1423 adults and 197 children). In adults at diagnosis, LDL-C
and LDL-C
levels were similar [235 ± 70 mg/dL (6.1 ± 1.8 mmol/L) vs 235 ± 69 mg/dL (6.1 ± 1.8 mmol/L), respectively; P = NS], while LDL-C
levels were non-significantly lower than LDL-C
[211 ± 61 mg/dL (5.5 ± 1.6 mmol/L); P = 0.432]. In treated adults (n = 966) both LDL-C
[150 ± 71 mg/dL (3.9 ± 1.8 mmol/L)] and LDL-C
levels [151 ± 70 mg/dL (6.1 ± 1.8 mmol/L); P = 0.746] were similar, whereas LDL-C
levels were significantly lower than LDL-C
[121 ± 62 mg/dL (3.1 ± 1.6 mmol/L); P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1476-511X 1476-511X |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12944-020-01289-5 |