Effects of malnutrition on disease severity and adverse outcomes in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: a retrospective cohort study
Malnutrition is common in patients with chronic cardiovascular disease and is associated with significantly higher all-cause mortality. Approximately one-third of patients with heart failure are malnourished. However, the relationship between malnutrition and idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertensi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Respiratory research 2024-07, Vol.25 (1), p.292-12, Article 292 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Malnutrition is common in patients with chronic cardiovascular disease and is associated with significantly higher all-cause mortality. Approximately one-third of patients with heart failure are malnourished. However, the relationship between malnutrition and idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the prognostic value of malnutrition in patients with IPAH.
A total of 432 consecutive participants with IPAH were included in this study between March 2013 and August 2021. Three common malnutrition assessment tools, including the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, were used to evaluate the nutritional status of patients with IPAH. The relationships between the malnutrition tools and long-term adverse outcomes were determined using restricted cubic splines and multivariate Cox regression models.
During a mean follow-up of 3.1 years, 158 participants experienced clinical worsening or all-cause death. Patients were stratified into the low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups based on the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) risk stratification, and the PNI (55.9 ± 5.7 vs. 54.4 ± 7.2 vs. 51.1 ± 7.1, P = 0.005) and CONUT score (2.1 ± 0.9 vs. 2.5 ± 1.2 vs. 3.3 ± 1.1, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1465-993X 1465-9921 1465-993X |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12931-024-02925-9 |