Mupirocin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Mupirocin is widely used for nasal decolonization of to prevent subsequent staphylococcal infection in patients and healthcare personnel. However, the prolonged and unrestricted use has led to the emergence of mupirocin-resistant (mupR) . The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the prev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Antimicrobial resistance & infection control 2018-08, Vol.7 (1), p.101-101, Article 101
Hauptverfasser: Shittu, Adebayo O, Kaba, Mamadou, Abdulgader, Shima M, Ajao, Yewande O, Abiola, Mujibat O, Olatimehin, Ayodele O
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Mupirocin is widely used for nasal decolonization of to prevent subsequent staphylococcal infection in patients and healthcare personnel. However, the prolonged and unrestricted use has led to the emergence of mupirocin-resistant (mupR) . The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the prevalence, phenotypic and molecular characteristics, and geographic spread of mupR in Africa. We examined five electronic databases (EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, ISI Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Scopus) for relevant English articles on screening for mupR from various samples in Africa. In addition, we performed random effects meta-analysis of proportions to determine the pooled prevalence of mupR in Africa. The search was conducted until 3 August 2016. We identified 43 eligible studies of which 11 (26%) were obtained only through Google Scholar. Most of the eligible studies (28/43; 65%) were conducted in Nigeria (10/43; 23%), Egypt (7/43; 16%), South Africa (6/43; 14%) and Tunisia (5/43; 12%). Overall, screening for mupR was described in only 12 of 54 (22%) African countries. The disk diffusion method was the widely used technique (67%; 29/43) for the detection of mupR in Africa. The -positive isolates were identified in five studies conducted in Egypt (  = 2), South Africa (  = 2), and Nigeria (  = 1). Low-level resistance (LmupR) and high-level resistance (HmupR) were both reported in six human studies from South Africa (  = 3), Egypt (  = 2) and Libya (  = 1). Data on mupR-MRSA was available in 11 studies from five countries, including Egypt, Ghana, Libya, Nigeria and South Africa. The pooled prevalence (based on 11 human studies) of mupR in Africa was 14% (95% CI =6.8 to 23.2%). The proportion of -positive in Africa ranged between 0.5 and 8%. Furthermore, the frequency of isolates that exhibited LmupR, HmupR and mupR-MRSA in Africa were 4 and 47%, 0.5 and 38%, 5 and 50%, respectively. The prevalence of mupR in Africa (14%) is worrisome and there is a need for data on administration and use of mupirocin. The disk diffusion method which is widely utilized in Africa could be an important method for the screening and identification of mupR . Moreover, we advocate for surveillance studies with appropriate guidelines for screening mupR in Africa.
ISSN:2047-2994
2047-2994
DOI:10.1186/s13756-018-0382-5