Supersymmetric interpretation of the muon g – 2 anomaly
A bstract The Fermilab Muon g − 2 collaboration recently announced the first result of measurement of the muon anomalous magnetic moment ( g − 2), which confirmed the previous result at the Brookhaven National Laboratory and thus the discrepancy with its Standard Model prediction. We revisit low-sca...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of high energy physics 2021-07, Vol.2021 (7), p.1-26, Article 75 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A
bstract
The Fermilab Muon
g
−
2 collaboration recently announced the first result of measurement of the muon anomalous magnetic moment (
g
−
2), which confirmed the previous result at the Brookhaven National Laboratory and thus the discrepancy with its Standard Model prediction. We revisit low-scale supersymmetric models that are naturally capable to solve the muon
g
−
2 anomaly, focusing on two distinct scenarios: chargino-contribution dominated and pure-bino-contribution dominated scenarios. It is shown that the slepton pair-production searches have excluded broad parameter spaces for both two scenarios, but they are not closed yet. For the chargino-dominated scenario, the models with
m
μ
˜
L
≳
m
χ
˜
1
±
are still widely allowed. For the bino-dominated scenario, we find that, although slightly non-trivial, the region with low tan
β
with heavy higgsinos is preferred. In the case of universal slepton masses, the low mass regions with
m
μ
˜
≲ 230 GeV can explain the
g
−
2 anomaly while satisfying the LHC constraints. Furthermore, we checked that the stau-bino coannihilation works properly to realize the bino thermal relic dark matter. We also investigate heavy staus case for the bino-dominated scenario, where the parameter region that can explain the muon
g
−
2 anomaly is stretched to
m
μ
˜
≲ 1
.
3 TeV. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1029-8479 1029-8479 |
DOI: | 10.1007/JHEP07(2021)075 |