190 Timing of steroid doses and response rates to immune-checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic cancer

BackgroundCorticosteroids (CS) are the mainstay of immune-related adverse effect (irAE) management, as well as for other indications in cancer treatment. Previous studies evaluating whether CS affect immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) efficacy compared patients receiving steroids vs. no steroids.1 Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal for immunotherapy of cancer 2020-11, Vol.8 (Suppl 3), p.A204-A204
Hauptverfasser: Tawagi, Karine, Maslov, Diana, Simenson, Victoria, Yuan, Helen, Parent, Cameron, Bamnolker, Adi, Goel, Richa, Blake, Zoe, Madhav, KC, Matrana, Marc, Johnson, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BackgroundCorticosteroids (CS) are the mainstay of immune-related adverse effect (irAE) management, as well as for other indications in cancer treatment. Previous studies evaluating whether CS affect immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) efficacy compared patients receiving steroids vs. no steroids.1 This comparison may be confounded by different rates of irAEs, which are known to be associated with higher response rates to CPIs. Preclinically CS have been shown to diminish naïve T-cell proliferation and differentiation,2 though there is a paucity of clinical data evaluating how the timing of concomitant CS affects CPI efficacy.MethodsWe retrospectively collected data from patients treated with CPIs alone, who received CS during their CPI treatment at a single institution. Patients were allocated into two cohorts based on timing of initiation of CS (> 2 months vs. < 2 months after initiating CPI). Patient characteristics, irAEs, cancer type, treatment type, treatment response/progression per RECIST v1.1, and survival data were collected. Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression methods were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for the primary endpoint of progression free survival (PFS) along with overall survival (OS).ResultsWe identified 247 patients with metastatic cancer who received CS concurrently with CPIs alone. The majority of patients had non-small cell lung cancer (n=98), followed by renal cell carcinoma (n=43), and melanoma (n=30). 242 patients were on PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy, while 45 patients received CPI in combination with anti-CTLA-4 ipilimumab (table 1). The median time on steroids for all patients was 1.8 months. After adjusting for differences in rates of treatment type, tumor type, brain metastases and irAEs, patients who were treated with CS > 2 months after starting CPI had a statistically significant longer progression free survival (PFS) [HR of 0.33, p≤0.0001], and overall survival (OS) [HR of 0.36, p≤0.0001] than those who received steroids < 2 months after starting CPI. Rates of irAEs in each group were not significantly different (p = 0.15). Objective response rate (ORR) for patients on CS > 2 months was 39.8%, vs. ORR for patients
ISSN:2051-1426
DOI:10.1136/jitc-2020-SITC2020.0190