Active Versus Expectant Management for Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes at 34-36 Weeks of Gestation and the Associated Adverse Perinatal Outcomes

To compare the type of management (active versus expectant) for preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) between 34 and 36 + 6 weeks of gestation and the associated adverse perinatal outcomes in 2 tertiary hospitals in the southeast of Brazil.  In the present retrospective cohort study, data w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia 2020-11, Vol.42 (11), p.717-725
Hauptverfasser: Ferraz, Malú Flôres, Lima, Thaísa De Souza, Cintra, Sarah Moura, Araujo Júnior, Edward, Petrini, Caetano Galvão, Caetano, Mario Sergio Silva Gomes, Paschoini, Marina Carvalho, Peixoto, Alberto Borges
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To compare the type of management (active versus expectant) for preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) between 34 and 36 + 6 weeks of gestation and the associated adverse perinatal outcomes in 2 tertiary hospitals in the southeast of Brazil.  In the present retrospective cohort study, data were obtained by reviewing the medical records of patients admitted to two tertiary centers with different protocols for PPROM management. The participants were divided into two groups based on PPROM management: group I (active) and group II (expectant). For statistical analysis, the Student -test, the chi-squared test, and binary logistic regression were used.  Of the 118 participants included, 78 underwent active (group I) and 40 expectant management (group II). Compared with group II, group I had significantly lower mean amniotic fluid index (5.5 versus 11.3 cm,  = 0.002), polymerase chain reaction at admission (1.5 versus 5.2 mg/dl,  = 0.002), time of prophylactic antibiotics (5.4 versus 18.4 hours,  
ISSN:0100-7203
1806-9339
1806-9339
DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1718954