Hypoxaemia in the early stage of COVID-19: prevalence of physical or biochemical factors?
We read with interest the reply from B usana et al. [1] to our correspondence [2]. We fully agree with the authors and with the cited references [3–6] stating that the affinity of haemoglobin (Hb) for oxygen (O 2 ) is not affected in the arteries or in the veins of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European respiratory review 2022-09, Vol.31 (165), p.220138 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We read with interest the reply from B
usana
et al.
[1] to our correspondence [2]. We fully agree with the authors and with the cited references [3–6] stating that the affinity of haemoglobin (Hb) for oxygen (O
2
) is not affected in the arteries or in the veins of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. The confusion arises as our concept is based on the biochemical shunt due to the quaternary conformational change of Hb with a temporary decrease of Hb–O
2
affinity, which is applicable only to the affected alveolar-capillary bed.
The ventilation–perfusion mismatch can't explain the high
P
aCO
2
–
P
ETCO
2
gap in the setting of COVID-19 induced hypoxaemia and cannot be considered as the sole pathophysiological basis for the treatment in the early stage of COVID-19
https://bit.ly/3BKmGxJ |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0905-9180 1600-0617 |
DOI: | 10.1183/16000617.0138-2022 |