Comparison of outcomes between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic cardiac arrest patients receiving targeted temperature management: The nationwide TIMECARD multicenter registry
Targeted temperature management (TTM) has been recommended for post-resuscitation care of cardiac arrest (CA) patients who remain comatose. However, the differences between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic causes need further investigation. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the difference in outc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 2023-08, Vol.122 (8), p.675-689 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Targeted temperature management (TTM) has been recommended for post-resuscitation care of cardiac arrest (CA) patients who remain comatose. However, the differences between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic causes need further investigation. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the difference in outcomes between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic CA patients receiving TTM.
The TIMECARD registry established the study cohort and database for patients receiving TTM between January 2013 and September 2019. A total of 543 patients were enrolled, with 305 and 238 patients in the cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic groups, respectively.
Compared with the non-cardiogenic group, the cardiogenic group had higher proportion of initial shockable rhythm, better survival (cardiogenic: 45.9%; non-cardiogenic: 30.7%, P = 0.0017), and better neurologic performance at discharge. In the cardiogenic group, witnessed collapse (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.13–0.72), and coronary intervention (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.24–0.84) were positive predictors for overall outcome. Mean arterial pressure |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0929-6646 1876-0821 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jfma.2022.11.007 |