Safety profile of sacituzumab govitecan in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG), a first-in-class anti-trophoblast cell surface antigen-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), has shown clinically meaningful improvement in outcomes of patients with breast cancer (BC). However, it has also been accompanied by significant toxicity. Thus, we conducted...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Breast (Edinburgh) 2025-02, Vol.79, p.103853, Article 103853 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG), a first-in-class anti-trophoblast cell surface antigen-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), has shown clinically meaningful improvement in outcomes of patients with breast cancer (BC). However, it has also been accompanied by significant toxicity. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and tolerability of SG in this patient population.
We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, and ASCO and ESMO websites for clinical trials (CTs) assessing the safety of SG in BC patients. All analyses were performed in R software (v.4.2.2) using random effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 test.
Seven studies – three randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and four single-arm phase I/II – were included, comprising 928 patients receiving SG and 576 on treatment of physician's choice (TPC). Most patients had triple negative BC (54.4 %, n = 505), metastatic disease (89.8 %, n = 833), and were heavily pretreated (at least two lines of prior therapy). Most common all-grade adverse events (AEs) were: neutropenia (70 %, 95 % CI, 64–76 %), followed by nausea (62 %, 95 % CI, 55–68 %), diarrhea (54 %, 95 % CI 47–60 %) and anemia (51 %, 95 % CI, 38–65 %). Regarding high-grade AEs, 46 % of patients developed grade ≥3 neutropenia. Compared to TPC, we observed a higher risk of neutropenia (OR 3.11, 95 % CI 1.62–5.99, I2 = 81 %; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0960-9776 1532-3080 1532-3080 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103853 |