Subcutaneous Emphysema Caused by Third Molar Extraction

Computed tomography (CT) was performed in a 28-year-old woman, who was scheduled for carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) for osteosarcoma of the right mandibular condyle (Figure 1, red arrow); CT confirmed the presence of air around the right parapharyngeal space (indicated by the yellow arrows in Fi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:OTO open : the official open access journal of the American Academy of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2021-01, Vol.5 (1), p.2473974X211004527-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Musha, Atsushi, Ohno, Tatsuya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Computed tomography (CT) was performed in a 28-year-old woman, who was scheduled for carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) for osteosarcoma of the right mandibular condyle (Figure 1, red arrow); CT confirmed the presence of air around the right parapharyngeal space (indicated by the yellow arrows in Figures 1-3). Palpation confirmed crepitus in the lower jaw and neck; no spontaneous symptoms were observed. The subcutaneous emphysema possibly developed when the right mandibular, semi-impacted, horizontally placed third molar was extracted after sectioning using an air-turbine handpiece 2 days before CT imaging; the extraction was performed before C-ion RT to ease oral care following irradiation to the head and neck region, as food impaction was likely to occur under the mucosa overlying the semi-impacted tooth.1 The blue arrow indicates the socket from which the third molar was extracted (Figure 2). In this case, it is probable that when the mucoperiosteal flap formed and the third molar was sectioned with an air-turbine handpiece, air invaded the soft tissues from the mucoperiosteal flap2 and spread to the parapharyngeal space (Figure 4). This pathway is similar to that of odontogenic infections.3 Emphysema in this case could have possibly affected C-ion RT because particle beam therapy (such as C-ion and proton beam RT) is easily affected by air gaps. In fact, the physical properties of particles are more sensitive than photon therapy for planning uncertainties, and this may negatively affect the quality of particles.4 C-ion RT was therefore postponed. Two weeks later, air was not observed on repeat CT. During irradiation, no complications developed owing to the subcutaneous emphysema, and treatment was completed successfully. Tooth extraction requiring sectioning of the tooth using an air-turbine handpiece should be performed a few weeks before the planned CT, especially in cases planned for particles to the head and neck region.
ISSN:2473-974X
2473-974X
DOI:10.1177/2473974X211004527