Catestatin as a predictor for cardiac death in heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction

Aims Endogenous catecholamine release‐inhibitory peptide catestatin has been associated with heart failure (HF). This subgroup analysis of our cohort of HF compared the different effects of catestatin as a predictor for cardiac outcomes in patients with HF with reduced (HFrEF), mildly reduced (HFmrE...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ESC Heart Failure 2025-02, Vol.12 (1), p.517-524
Hauptverfasser: Chu, Song‐Yun, Peng, Fen, Wang, Jie, Liu, Lin, Zhao, Jing, Han, Xiao‐Ning, Ding, Wen‐Hui
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims Endogenous catecholamine release‐inhibitory peptide catestatin has been associated with heart failure (HF). This subgroup analysis of our cohort of HF compared the different effects of catestatin as a predictor for cardiac outcomes in patients with HF with reduced (HFrEF), mildly reduced (HFmrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction. Methods Plasma catestatin was measured in the HF patient cohort of 228 cases with a whole spectrum of ejection fraction. The cardiac deaths were analysed according to prespecified subgroups. Results Over a median follow‐up of 52.5 months, the association between plasma catestatin and cardiac death was different in patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF or HFpEF [hazard ratio (HR) 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99–2.37 and HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.56–4.75, respectively; interaction P = 0.022]. Patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF were older and more likely to be female, with non‐ischaemic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation but lower levels of plasma B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP). Similar adverse cardiac events occurred in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF as in HFrEF. Plasma catestatin was a better predictor for cardiovascular death in the HFmrEF/HFpEF patients [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.72, 95% CI 0.45–0.74] than in the HFrEF patients (AUC = 0.59, 95% CI 0.587–0.849). The optimal cut point of plasma catestatin level of 0.86 ng/mL predicted a 2.80‐fold elevated risk for cardiac death in HFmrEF/HFpEF. Conclusions Elevated plasma catestatin might be a more sensitive predictor for cardiac outcome in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF than in HFrEF.
ISSN:2055-5822
2055-5822
DOI:10.1002/ehf2.15107