Quantifying fossil fuel methane emissions using observations of atmospheric ethane and an uncertain emission ratio
We present a method for estimating fossil fuel methane emissions using observations of methane and ethane, accounting for uncertainty in their emission ratio. The ethane:methane emission ratio is incorporated as a spatially and temporally variable parameter in a Bayesian model, with its own prior di...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Atmospheric chemistry and physics 2022-03, Vol.22 (6), p.3911-3929 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We present a method for estimating fossil fuel methane emissions using observations of methane and ethane, accounting for uncertainty in their
emission ratio. The ethane:methane emission ratio is incorporated as a spatially and temporally variable parameter in a Bayesian
model, with its own prior distribution and uncertainty. We find that using an emission ratio distribution mitigates bias from using a fixed,
potentially incorrect emission ratio and that uncertainty in this ratio is propagated into posterior estimates of emissions. A synthetic data test
is used to show the impact of assuming an incorrect ethane:methane emission ratio and demonstrate how our variable parameter model
can better quantify overall uncertainty. We also use this method to estimate UK methane emissions from high-frequency observations of methane and
ethane from the UK Deriving Emissions linked to Climate Change (DECC) network. Using the joint methane–ethane inverse model, we estimate annual
mean UK methane emissions of approximately 0.27 (95 % uncertainty interval 0.26–0.29) Tg yr−1 from fossil fuel sources and 2.06 (1.99–2.15) Tg yr−1 from non-fossil fuel sources, during the period 2015–2019. Uncertainties in UK fossil fuel emissions estimates are
reduced on average by 15 % and up to 35 % when incorporating ethane into the inverse model, in comparison to results from the methane-only
inversion. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1680-7324 1680-7316 1680-7324 |
DOI: | 10.5194/acp-22-3911-2022 |