Superiority of Supervised Machine Learning on Reading Chest X-Rays in Intensive Care Units

Purpose: Portable chest radiographs are diagnostically indispensable in intensive care units (ICU). This study aimed to determine if the proposed machine learning technique increased in accuracy as the number of radiograph readings increased and if it was accurate in a clinical setting. Methods: Two...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in medicine 2021-10, Vol.8, p.676277-676277
Hauptverfasser: Tanaka, Kumiko, Nakada, Taka-aki, Takahashi, Nozomi, Dozono, Takahiro, Yoshimura, Yuichiro, Yokota, Hajime, Horikoshi, Takuro, Nakaguchi, Toshiya, Shinozaki, Koichiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: Portable chest radiographs are diagnostically indispensable in intensive care units (ICU). This study aimed to determine if the proposed machine learning technique increased in accuracy as the number of radiograph readings increased and if it was accurate in a clinical setting. Methods: Two independent data sets of portable chest radiographs ( n = 380, a single Japanese hospital; n = 1,720, The National Institution of Health [NIH] ChestX-ray8 dataset) were analyzed. Each data set was divided training data and study data. Images were classified as atelectasis, pleural effusion, pneumonia, or no emergency. DenseNet-121, as a pre-trained deep convolutional neural network was used and ensemble learning was performed on the best-performing algorithms. Diagnostic accuracy and processing time were compared to those of ICU physicians. Results: In the single Japanese hospital data, the area under the curve (AUC) of diagnostic accuracy was 0.768. The area under the curve (AUC) of diagnostic accuracy significantly improved as the number of radiograph readings increased from 25 to 100% in the NIH data set. The AUC was higher than 0.9 for all categories toward the end of training with a large sample size. The time to complete 53 radiographs by machine learning was 70 times faster than the time taken by ICU physicians (9.66 s vs. 12 min). The diagnostic accuracy was higher by machine learning than by ICU physicians in most categories (atelectasis, AUC 0.744 vs. 0.555, P < 0.05; pleural effusion, 0.856 vs. 0.706, P < 0.01; pneumonia, 0.720 vs. 0.744, P = 0.88; no emergency, 0.751 vs. 0.698, P = 0.47). Conclusions: We developed an automatic detection system for portable chest radiographs in ICU setting; its performance was superior and quite faster than ICU physicians.
ISSN:2296-858X
2296-858X
DOI:10.3389/fmed.2021.676277