Should Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting Be Used in Patients After Recent Myocardial Infarction?
Background Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting (BITA) is associated with improved survival. However, surgeons do not commonly use BITA in patients after myocardial infarction (MI) because survival is good with single internal thoracic artery grafting (SITA). We aimed to compare the outcomes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Heart Association 2017-07, Vol.6 (7), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting (BITA) is associated with improved survival. However, surgeons do not commonly use BITA in patients after myocardial infarction (MI) because survival is good with single internal thoracic artery grafting (SITA). We aimed to compare the outcomes of BITA with those of SITA and other approaches in patients with multivessel disease after recent MI.
Methods and Results
In total, 938 patients with recent MI ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2047-9980 2047-9980 |
DOI: | 10.1161/JAHA.117.005951 |