Comparing Plastic Surgeon Operative Time for DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: 2-stage More Efficient than 1-stage?

The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction is associated with lengthy operative times that remain an issue for plastic surgeons today. The main objective of this study was to determine if a 2-stage deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction resulted in a shor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open 2021-06, Vol.9 (6), p.e3608-e3608
Hauptverfasser: Issa, Christopher J., Lu, Stephen M., Boudiab, Elizabeth M., DeSano, Jeffrey, Sachanandani, Neil S., Powers, Jeremy M., Chaiyasate, Kongkrit
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction is associated with lengthy operative times that remain an issue for plastic surgeons today. The main objective of this study was to determine if a 2-stage deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction resulted in a shorter total plastic surgeon operative time compared with an immediate reconstruction. A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients who underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction from February 2013 to July 2020 by the senior author. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, mastectomy characteristics, expander placement, reconstructive procedures, operative time, and complications were tabulated. The study included a total of 128 patients. For immediate/1-stage flap reconstruction, average operative times for the plastic surgeon were 427.0 minutes for unilateral procedures, and 506.3 minutes for bilateral procedures. For delayed/2-stage reconstruction, average combined plastic surgeon operative times were 351.1 minutes for unilateral expander followed by flap reconstruction (75.9 minutes shorter than immediate unilateral, = 0.007), and 464.8 minutes for bilateral reconstruction (41.5 minutes shorter than immediate bilateral, = 0.04). Total patient time under anesthesia was longer for 2-staged bilateral reconstruction ( 0.0001), but did not differ significantly for unilateral reconstruction. Complications between immediate and delayed groups were not significantly different. We found that staged reconstruction over 2 procedures resulted in a significant reduction in operative time for the plastic surgeon for both unilateral and bilateral reconstruction. With amenable breast surgeons and patients, the advantages of controlling scheduling and the operating room may encourage plastic surgeons to consider performing free flap reconstruction in a delayed fashion.
ISSN:2169-7574
2169-7574
DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000003608