Arthroscopic Findings During Routine Ankle ORIF: What is Being Missed?

Category: Ankle; Arthroscopy; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Ankle fractures are among the most common operatively treated injuries by orthopedic surgeons. However, up to 20% of patients will have continued pain and poor patient reported outcomes despite good/excellent radiographic results. Ankle frac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foot & ankle orthopaedics 2020-10, Vol.5 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Howard, Shain, Hoang, Victor C., Watson, Troy S., Brady, Candice L., Eudy, Adam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Category: Ankle; Arthroscopy; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Ankle fractures are among the most common operatively treated injuries by orthopedic surgeons. However, up to 20% of patients will have continued pain and poor patient reported outcomes despite good/excellent radiographic results. Ankle fractures typically occur with varying degrees of intra-articular and soft tissue injury which can include ligamentous injury, loose bodies, and chondral lesions. The aim of study is to document intra-articular findings with ankle arthroscopy prior to ankle open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and to contribute to the growing body of literature that shows this to be a safe adjunct to fracture fixation. Methods: IRB approval was obtained prior to chart review. This is a retrospective review of ankle fractures that were treated with arthroscopy and ORIF by a single surgeon. Between August 2016 and July 2018 Operative reports, office notes, and images were reviewed to identify intra-articular pathology and fracture type. Analysis was performed with regard to fracture type, presence and location of osteochondral lesions, presence of loose-body, syndesmotic injury, and deltoid injury. Results: Fifty-seven ankle fractures were identified that met inclusion criteria. 84.2% of the fractures had intra-articular pathology, most commonly a syndesmotic injury followed by loose joint body and osteochondral defect. Conclusion: Arthroscopic evaluation during ankle fracture ORIF, particularly pronation external rotation and supination external rotation patterns give a more detailed examination of associated pathology. Arthroscopy at the time of ankle fracture fixation is a safe adjunct and should be considered a potential compliment to routine ORIF of ankle fractures.
ISSN:2473-0114
2473-0114
DOI:10.1177/2473011420S00262