Three-dimensional Assessment of Temporomandibular Joint Volume, and Condylar and Glenoid-fossa Morphology: A Cone-beam Computed Tomography Study

The condylar and glenoid fossa morphology can alter in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD), which can lead to changes in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) space volume. Volumetric evaluation of TMJ can represent the entire three-dimensional (3D)-joint space between the condyle and glenoi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contemporary clinical dentistry 2023-10, Vol.14 (4), p.256-264
Hauptverfasser: Mehta, Shivam, Gandhi, Vaibhav, Patel, Apexa, Chen, Po-Jung, Lin, Meng-Hsuan, Kuo, Chia-Ling, Tadinada, Aditya, Yadav, Sumit
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The condylar and glenoid fossa morphology can alter in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD), which can lead to changes in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) space volume. Volumetric evaluation of TMJ can represent the entire three-dimensional (3D)-joint space between the condyle and glenoid fossa. To perform 3D assessment of TMJ volume, condylar, and glenoid-fossa morphology using cone-beam computed tomography and evaluate the correlation between these parameters. Thirty-four patients (age: 13.50 years) who had no previous history of TMD were included. The volume of TMJ space was measured and divided into anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral TMJ volume. The antero-posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) condylar width, AP and ML glenoid-fossa width, and glenoid-fossa depth were evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed with R software at a 0.05 significance level. Each parameter was compared between the left and right sides using a paired-t test. The correlations between the parameters were obtained by the Pearson correlation coefficient. There was no significant difference between lateral and medial TMJ volume; however, posterior TMJ volume was significantly greater than anterior TMJ volume. A significant correlation was observed between AP glenoid-fossa width and TMJ volume, glenoid-fossa depth and TMJ volume, AP position of the condyle and anterior TMJ volume, ML position of the condyle and medial TMJ volume, glenoid-fossa width and condyle width in AP and ML dimension, glenoid-fossa depth and AP glenoid-fossa width. In addition to the evaluation of condylar and glenoid-fossa morphology, assessment of TMJ space volume is important for comprehensive evaluation of the joint.
ISSN:0976-237X
0976-2361
DOI:10.4103/ccd.ccd_254_23