MRI-based deep learning can discriminate between temporal lobe epilepsy, Alzheimer’s disease, and healthy controls

Background Radiological identification of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is crucial for diagnosis and treatment planning. TLE neuroimaging abnormalities are pervasive at the group level, but they can be subtle and difficult to identify by visual inspection of individual scans, prompting applications o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Communications medicine 2023-02, Vol.3 (1), p.33-11, Article 33
Hauptverfasser: Chang, Allen J., Roth, Rebecca, Bougioukli, Eleni, Ruber, Theodor, Keller, Simon S., Drane, Daniel L., Gross, Robert E., Welsh, James, Abrol, Anees, Calhoun, Vince, Karakis, Ioannis, Kaestner, Erik, Weber, Bernd, McDonald, Carrie, Gleichgerrcht, Ezequiel, Bonilha, Leonardo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Radiological identification of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is crucial for diagnosis and treatment planning. TLE neuroimaging abnormalities are pervasive at the group level, but they can be subtle and difficult to identify by visual inspection of individual scans, prompting applications of artificial intelligence (AI) assisted technologies. Method We assessed the ability of a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm to classify TLE vs. patients with AD vs. healthy controls using T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. We used feature visualization techniques to identify regions the CNN employed to differentiate disease types. Results We show the following classification results: healthy control accuracy = 81.54% (SD = 1.77%), precision = 0.81 (SD = 0.02), recall = 0.85 (SD = 0.03), and F1-score = 0.83 (SD = 0.02); TLE accuracy = 90.45% (SD = 1.59%), precision = 0.86 (SD = 0.03), recall = 0.86 (SD = 0.04), and F1-score = 0.85 (SD = 0.04); and AD accuracy = 88.52% (SD = 1.27%), precision = 0.64 (SD = 0.05), recall = 0.53 (SD = 0.07), and F1 score = 0.58 (0.05). The high accuracy in identification of TLE was remarkable, considering that only 47% of the cohort had deemed to be lesional based on MRI alone. Model predictions were also considerably better than random permutation classifications ( p  
ISSN:2730-664X
2730-664X
DOI:10.1038/s43856-023-00262-4