Matching of turn pattern measurements for cyclotrons using multiobjective optimization
The usage of numerical models to study the evolution of particle beams is an essential step in the design process of particle accelerators. However, uncertainties of input quantities such as the beam energy and magnetic field lead to simulation results that do not fully agree with measurements; henc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physical review. Accelerators and beams 2019-06, Vol.22 (6), p.064602, Article 064602 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The usage of numerical models to study the evolution of particle beams is an essential step in the design process of particle accelerators. However, uncertainties of input quantities such as the beam energy and magnetic field lead to simulation results that do not fully agree with measurements; hence, the final machine will behave slightly differently than the simulations. In the case of cyclotrons, such discrepancies affect the overall turn pattern or may even alter the number of turns in the machine. Inaccuracies at the PSI Ring cyclotron facility that may harm the isochronism are compensated by additional magnetic fields provided by 18 trim coils. These are often absent from simulations or their implementation is very simplistic. In this paper, a newly developed realistic trim coil model within the particle accelerator framework OPAL is presented that was used to match the turn pattern of the PSI Ring cyclotron. Because of the high-dimensional search space consisting of 48 design variables (simulation input parameters) and 182 objectives (i.e., turns), the simulation and measurement cannot be matched in a straightforward manner. Instead, an evolutionary multiobjective optimization with a population size of more than 8000 individuals per generation together with a local search approach were applied that reduced the maximum absolute error to 4.5 mm over all 182 turns. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2469-9888 2469-9888 |
DOI: | 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.22.064602 |