Erlotinib plus bevacizumab versus erlotinib alone in patients with EGFR-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

ObjectivesCombination treatment with erlotinib plus bevacizumab has the potential to become a standard treatment regimen for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm+) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open 2022-08, Vol.12 (8), p.e062036-e062036
Hauptverfasser: Deng, Wusheng, Wang, Ke, Jiang, Yun, Li, Dingbin, Bao, Chongxi, Luo, Jing, Liu, Liuyuan, Huang, Bing, Kong, Jinliang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ObjectivesCombination treatment with erlotinib plus bevacizumab has the potential to become a standard treatment regimen for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm+) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of erlotinib plus bevacizumab in patients with EGFRm+ advanced NSCLC.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesThe PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched, from inception to 15 January 2022.Eligibility criteriaWe included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), reported in English, assessing the efficacy of erlotinib plus bevacizumab versus erlotinib monotherapy in patients with EGFRm+ advanced NSCLC.Data extraction and synthesisThe main objective was to assess overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs). Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. A random-effects model was used where there was evidence for homogeneous effects.ResultsFour RCTs (reported across six publications) were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 775 patients included in the pooled analyses of PFS, OS and ORR (387 in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab intervention group and 388 in the erlotinib group). Compared with the erlotinib alone group, the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group achieved a significantly prolonged PFS (HR: 0.59; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.72; p
ISSN:2044-6055
2044-6055
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062036