Comparison of 2D, 2.5D, and 3D segmentation networks for maxillary sinuses and lesions in CBCT images
Background The purpose of this study was to compare the segmentation performances of the 2D, 2.5D, and 3D networks for maxillary sinuses (MSs) and lesions inside the maxillary sinus (MSL) with variations in sizes, shapes, and locations in cone beam CT (CBCT) images under the same constraint of memor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMC oral health 2023-11, Vol.23 (1), p.1-866, Article 866 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background The purpose of this study was to compare the segmentation performances of the 2D, 2.5D, and 3D networks for maxillary sinuses (MSs) and lesions inside the maxillary sinus (MSL) with variations in sizes, shapes, and locations in cone beam CT (CBCT) images under the same constraint of memory capacity. Methods The 2D, 2.5D, and 3D networks were compared comprehensively for the segmentation of the MS and MSL in CBCT images under the same constraint of memory capacity. MSLs were obtained by subtracting the prediction of the air region of the maxillary sinus (MSA) from that of the MS. Results The 2.5D network showed the highest segmentation performances for the MS and MSA compared to the 2D and 3D networks. The performances of the Jaccard coefficient, Dice similarity coefficient, precision, and recall by the 2.5D network of U-net + + reached 0.947, 0.973, 0.974, and 0.971 for the MS, respectively, and 0.787, 0.875, 0.897, and 0.858 for the MSL, respectively. Conclusions The 2.5D segmentation network demonstrated superior segmentation performance for various MSLs with an ensemble learning approach of combining the predictions from three orthogonal planes. Keywords: Deep learning, CBCT image, Maxillary sinus segmentation, Maxillary sinus lesion segmentation, 2.5D network |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1472-6831 1472-6831 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12903-023-03607-6 |