Pilot Study of Intra-Aortic Balloon Occlusion to Limit Morbidity in Patients with Adherent Placentation Undergoing Cesarean Hysterectomy

Abstract Objective  We study whether using an intra-aortic balloon (IAB) during cesarean hysterectomy decreases delivery morbidity in patients with suspected morbidly adherent placentation. Study Design  This is a retrospective cohort study of deliveries complicated by suspected abnormal placentatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of perinatology reports 2018-04, Vol.8 (2), p.e57-e63
Hauptverfasser: Blumenthal, Elizabeth, Rao, Rashmi, Murphy, Aisling, Gornbein, Jeffrey, Hong, Richard, Moriarty, John M., Kahn, Daniel A., Janzen, Carla
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective  We study whether using an intra-aortic balloon (IAB) during cesarean hysterectomy decreases delivery morbidity in patients with suspected morbidly adherent placentation. Study Design  This is a retrospective cohort study of deliveries complicated by suspected abnormal placentation between 2009 and 2016 comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes with an IAB placed prior to cesarean hysterectomy versus no IAB. The primary outcome included quantified blood loss (QBL). Results  Thirty-five cases were reviewed, 16 with IAB and 19 without IAB. No difference was seen in median QBL between the two groups (1,351 vs. 1,397 mL; p  = 0.90). There were no significant differences in overall surgical complications (19% IAB, 21% no IAB; p  = 0.86), bladder complications (12 vs. 21%; p  = 0.66), intensive care unit admissions (12 vs. 26%; p  = 0.41), surgical duration (2.9 vs. 2.8 hour; p  = 0.83), or blood transfusions (median 2 vs. 2; p  = 0.27) between the two groups. There was one groin hematoma at the balloon site that was managed conservatively. There were no complications involving thrombosis or limb ischemia in the IAB group. Conclusion  While we did not detect statistically significant differences, larger studies may be warranted given the potential for extreme morbidity in these cases. This study highlights the potential use of an IAB in the management of these cases.
ISSN:2157-6998
2157-7005
DOI:10.1055/s-0038-1641736