Noninvasive Respiratory Support Does Not Prevent Extubation Failure in High-Risk Norwood Patients

This study aims to determine whether bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) effectively mitigate the risk of extubation failure in children status post-Norwood procedure. DESIGNSingle-center, retrospective analysis. Extubation events were collected fr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care explorations 2022-10, Vol.4 (10), p.e0782-e0782
Hauptverfasser: Hassan, Adel M., Acosta, Sebastian, Zheng, Feng, Rusin, Craig, Savorgnan, Fabio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aims to determine whether bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) effectively mitigate the risk of extubation failure in children status post-Norwood procedure. DESIGNSingle-center, retrospective analysis. Extubation events were collected from January 2015 to July 2021. Extubation failure was defined as the need for reintubation within 48 hours of extubation. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and ventilatory settings were compared between successful and failed extubations. SETTINGPediatric cardiovascular ICU. PATIENTSNeonates following Norwood procedure. INTERVENTIONSExtubation following the Norwood procedure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTSThe analysis included 311 extubations. Extubation failure occurred in 31 (10%) extubation attempts within the first 48 hours. On univariate analysis, higher rate of extubation failure was observed when patients were extubated to CPAP/BiPAP relative to patients who were extubated to either high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) or nasal cannula (NC) (16% vs 7.8%; p = 0.027). On multivariable analysis, the presence of vocal cord anomaly (odds ratio, 3.08; p = 0.005) and lower pre-extubation end-tidal co2 (odds ratio, 0.91; p = 0.006) were simultaneously associated with extubation failure while also controlling for the post-extubation respiratory support (CPAP/BiPAP/HFNC vs NC). CONCLUSIONSClinicians should not rely on CPAP or BiPAP as the only supportive measure for a patient at increased risk of extubation failure. CPAP or BiPAP do not mitigate the risk of extubation failure in the Norwood patients. A multisite study is needed to generalize these conclusions.
ISSN:2639-8028
2639-8028
DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000782