International Retrospective Cohort Study of Conversion Therapy for Stage IV Gastric Cancer 1 (CONVO‐GC‐1)

Aim Much attention has been paid to conversion therapy for stage IV gastric cancer, however, its operative comorbidities and survival benefit have not yet been clarified. CONVO‐GC‐1, an international retrospective cohort study, was designed to investigate the role of conversion surgery in Japan, Kor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of gastroenterological surgery 2022-03, Vol.6 (2), p.227-240
Hauptverfasser: Yoshida, Kazuhiro, Yasufuku, Itaru, Terashima, Masanori, Young Rha, Sun, Moon Bae, Jae, Li, Guoxin, Katai, Hitoshi, Watanabe, Masahiko, Seto, Yasuyuki, Hoon Noh, Sung, Kwang Yang, Han‐, Ji, Jiafu, Baba, Hideo, Kitagawa, Yuko, Morita, Satoshi, Nishiyama, Masahiko, Kodera, Yasuhiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim Much attention has been paid to conversion therapy for stage IV gastric cancer, however, its operative comorbidities and survival benefit have not yet been clarified. CONVO‐GC‐1, an international retrospective cohort study, was designed to investigate the role of conversion surgery in Japan, Korea, and China. Methods The rate of operative complications was the primary endpoint and the overall survival (OS), according to the four‐category criteria previously published (Gastric Cancer:19; 2016), was analyzed as the secondary endpoint. Results A total of 1206 patients underwent surgery after chemotherapy with curative intent. Operative complications were observed in 290 (24.0%) patients in all grades, including pancreatic fistula and surgical site infection. The median survival time (MST) of all resected patients was 36.7 mo (M) and those of R0, R1, and R2 resection were 56.6 M, 25.8 M, and 21.7 M, respectively. Moreover, the MST of R0 patients were 47.8 M, 116.7 M, 44.8 M in categories 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and not reached in category 4. Interestingly, the MST of P1 patients was as favorable as that of P0CY1 patients if R0 resection was achieved. The MST of patients with liver metastasis was also favorable regardless of the number of lesions, and the MST of patients with para‐aortic lymph node (LN) No 16a1/b2 metastasis was not inferior to that of patients with para‐aortic LN No 16a2/b1 metastasis. Conclusion Conversion therapy for stage IV gastric cancer is safe and could be a new therapeutic strategy to improve the survival of patients, especially those with R0 resection. R0 resection of conversion therapy can be a new strategy for gastric cancer.
ISSN:2475-0328
2475-0328
DOI:10.1002/ags3.12515