A novel approach to determining augmented bone volume in intraoral bone block augmentation using an intraoral scanner: an in vitro study

Introduction Bone augmentation procedures are established tools for reshaping the alveolar ridge and increasing bone volume. Different approaches are being used to measure postoperative bone volume gain. This study aimed to develop an objective and automated volume measurement tool equally as precis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of implant dentistry 2023-09, Vol.9 (1), p.26-26, Article 26
Hauptverfasser: Frederic, Weichel, Lukas, Kalchthaler, Reinald, Kühle, Christopher, Büsch, Oliver, Ristow, Michael, Engel, Christian, Freudlsperger, Jürgen, Hoffmann, Christian, Mertens
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Bone augmentation procedures are established tools for reshaping the alveolar ridge and increasing bone volume. Different approaches are being used to measure postoperative bone volume gain. This study aimed to develop an objective and automated volume measurement tool equally as precise as manual slice-by-slice annotation. Materials and methods To evaluate the proposed workflow, we performed an in vitro study with 20 pig mandibles that were grafted using three different grafting techniques—autogenous full block, split block bone and shell augmentation. The pig jaws were scanned pre- and postoperatively using an intraoral scanner. The resulting surface files (baseline, full block, split block, shell) were processed using the new volume-measuring workflow as well as using manual slice-by-slice annotation at baseline ( t 0) and at 6 months ( t 1) using the same population. Two TOSTs (Test of One-Sided Significance) and NHSTs (Null Hypothesis Significance Test) were used to compare the two workflows. The intra-rater reliability between t 0 and t 1 was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients. Results The mean difference for the full block augmentation technique was − 0.015 cm 3 ( p  
ISSN:2198-4034
2198-4034
DOI:10.1186/s40729-023-00492-0