Bupivacaine versus Ropivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Femorosciatic Blocks in Lower Limb Surgeries-A Randomised Clinical Trial

Introduction: Peripheral Nerve Blockade (PNB) is a wellaccepted component of comprehensive anaesthetic care. Ropivacaine is a newer local long acting anaesthetic agent. Despite the extensive use and relative safety of bupivacaine, ropivacaine has been developed as alternative agent to decrease the r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical and diagnostic research 2021-11, Vol.15 (11), p.UC10-UC13
Hauptverfasser: Kotmire, Vidya Subhash, Sonavane, Shalaka Ramesh, Chaure, Swati Bhalchandra, Tarapatla, Sudhams
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction: Peripheral Nerve Blockade (PNB) is a wellaccepted component of comprehensive anaesthetic care. Ropivacaine is a newer local long acting anaesthetic agent. Despite the extensive use and relative safety of bupivacaine, ropivacaine has been developed as alternative agent to decrease the risk for cardiac and nervous system. Aim: To compare safety, efficacy and duration of postoperative analgesia between bupivacaine and ropivacaine in femorosciatic blocks. Materials and Methods: This randomised clinical study was conducted, from August 2017 to April 2018, at HBT Medical College and Dr R.N.Cooper, Municipal General Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. Total of 78 patients scheduled to undergo elective knee and below knee orthopaedic surgeries under subarachnoid block were divided into two groups- group A, patients received 25 mL of 0.25% injection bupivacaine for femoral nerve block and sciatic nerve block each and in group B, patients received 25 mL of 0.25% Inj. ropivacaine for femoral nerve block and sciatic nerve block each. After giving femorosciatic block, Sub-Arachnoid Block (SAB) was given to all patients. The primary and secondary outcome variables were duration of analgesia and time of rescue analgesia, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, patient satisfaction score, surgeon satisfaction score, respectively. Continuous variables were analysed by unpaired t-test. The ordinal data was analysed using Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical data was analysed using chisquare test. Results: Demographic and haemodynamic parameters were statistically not significant. Time to the first rescue analgesia in group A was 718.2 minutes and in group B time was 652.1 minutes which was statistically significant (p-value=0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in VAS score at each time interval postoperatively. Both the drugs provided effective postoperative pain relief. All surgeons and patients were in agreement with analgesia, as evidenced by good patient satisfaction score. Mean surgeon satisfaction score was 7 in each groups. Conclusion: Bupivacaine provides longer duration of postoperative analgesia than ropivacaine. Both bupivacaine and ropivacaine achieved comparable quality of analgesia. Ropivacaine being a more cardiostable drug can be effectively used as an alternative to bupivacaine for femorosciatic nerve block in several clinical situations.
ISSN:2249-782X
0973-709X
DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2021/49185.15641